USPTO serial 78115256
X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART555 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 3200P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baseball gloves; baseball bats; racquets, namely racquets for tennis, squash, racquetball and badminton; golf clubs; golf gloves; golf bags, namely golf bags with and without wheels; gloves for games; exercise fitness equipment for weight and resistance training; chest expanders; dumb-bells; bar-bells; resistance tubing; specialized sporting apparel and equipment for use in providing support to the waist, feet, ankles, hips, thighs, bust, back, legs, arches, and calf; protective padding incorporated into specialized sports apparel; protective padding for use in sports activities, namely knee pads and guards, elbows pads and guards, shin pads and guards, hip pads and guards, and shoulder pads and guards; skis and snowboards; bags specially designed for skis, snowboards and surfboards; body boards; surf boards; fishing tackle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |