USPTO serial 78115589
INSYSTEMS EXTERITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSYSTEMS EXTERITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
BAZERMAN & DRANGEL PC BAZERMAN & DRANGEL, PC60 E 42ND STSTE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used by businesses to enable internal business processes to be used in online business environments; computer software for providing an integrated set of platform, tools and applications for creating and managing online businesses; computer software for use in the capture, organization, analysis, and management of information, across multiple channels, related to customers, and sales and marketing systems; computer software for managing individual relationships with customers, partners and regulators in the financial services and insurance industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation; integration of computer systems; computer software design for others; maintenance of computer software and programs; rental of computer software; installation of computer software for others and technical computer support, namely, telephone and on-site computer consultation in connection with the operation and maintenance of computer hardware and software up-dating of computer programs for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |