USPTO serial 78115978
SDAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SDAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter H Rudy
PETER RUDY RUDY AND ASSOCIATES PC2121B LONG SPUR LN PO BOX 3005AVON, CO 81620-3005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic equipment, namely, compact disc recorder and compact disc players, digital video disc players, speakers, microphones, audio and video cassette players, audio receivers, stereo transmitters, radios, stereo tuners, electrical and electronic cables and connectors, stereo amplifiers, for the reproduction, processing and amplification of audio and video signals | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |