Drawing for MASTERMILES

USPTO serial 78116010

MASTERMILES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERMILES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colm J. Dobbyn

MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY BANKING AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; STORED VALUE ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES, PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, AND TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES UTILIZING A RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICE TO ALLOW PAYMENT TO BE CHARGED TO A PREVIOUSLY SPECIFIED PAYMENT MECHANISM, SUCH AS A DEBIT CARD OR A CREDIT CARD, TRAVEL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES; CHEQUE VERIFICATION SERVICES; ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO TRAVELLERS' CHEQUES AND TRAVEL VOUCHERS; ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD PROGRAMS THAT INCLUDE TRAVEL BENEFITS AND AIRLINE FREQUENT FLYER POINTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 2, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance