USPTO serial 78117010
REAL WORLD SIGNAL PROCESSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REAL WORLD SIGNAL PROCESSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary C. Honeycutt
GARY C HONEYCUTT TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED12500 TI BLVDDALLAS, TX 75266UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Texas Instruments Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Texas Instruments Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REAL WORLD SIGNAL PROCESSING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |