Drawing for WHAMMY

USPTO serial 78117042

WHAMMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAMMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller, Jennifer B. Hodulik and Christina Liu

Susan L. Heller, Jennifer B. Hodulik and Christina Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, records, and CD-ROMs, all of the foregoing featuring television game shows; video game machine that is adapted or intended for use with a television, monitor or some other form of display apparatus which is separate from the video game machine; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs; interactive video game programs; electronically or magnetically activated pre-paid telephone debit cards; magnets; interactive computer game software downloaded from a global computer network; eyeglasses and sunglasses; gaming machines; gaming equipment, namely, slot machines with or without video outputACTIVE—
016Posters, calendars, notebooks, binders, daily organizers, memopads, stickers, comic books, playing cards, writing paper, envelopes, greeting cards, paper coasters, paper mats, newspapers for general circulation, books and magazines in the field of television game shows, photographs, postcards, trading cards, cardboard stand-up cutouts featuring photographs or artwork, prepaid phone debit cards without magnetic coding, trading card milk bottle caps, and personal checksACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, rainwear, T-shirts, sweat shirts, jerseys, shorts, sweat pants, jackets, hats, caps, scarves, gloves, hosiery, neckties, pajamas, robes, night shirts, night gowns, underwear, head bands, wrist bands, swim suits, skirts, shirts, tank tops, pants, coats, sweaters, leotards, leg warmers, stockings, socks, panty hose, tights, belts; footwear, namely, shoes, athletic shoes, slippers, boots, sandals; and headwear, namely, hats and capsACTIVE—
028Target games, board games and card games, kites, toy action figures, disc-type toss toys, bows and arrows, balls of all kinds, dolls, doll playsets, plush toys, toy vehicles, toy cars, toy trucks, toy bucket and shovel sets, roller skates, toy model hobbycraft kits, toy rockets, toy guns, toy holsters, musical toys, jigsaw puzzles, badminton sets, bubble making wands and solution sets, toy figurines, toy banks, puppets, toy balloons, yo-yos, skateboards, scooters, face masks, stand alone video game machines, LCD game machines, hand held unit for playing electronic games, but specifically excluding dice games and computer software gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 1, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 3, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance