USPTO serial 78117570
BOOST INTERNET SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOOST INTERNET SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Veronica Colby Devitt
VERONICA COLBY DEVITT THELEN REID & PRIEST LLPPO BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services; merchandising services, namely, product positioning, branding, identity and packaging concept development; preparing promotional and merchandising material for others; developing promotional campaigns for businesses; corporate image development, namely, public relations | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Website hosting and website design and development services; creative design services for others, namely commercial art design; graphic art design and computer graphics services | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOOST, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BOOST, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BOOST INTERNET SERVICE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOOST INTERNET SERVICES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |