USPTO serial 78117725
HIGH PERFORMANCE PRACTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIGH PERFORMANCE PRACTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of a full suite of applications used to automate a medical practice, namely, applications for registration, scheduling, office messaging, billing and electronic data interchange, collections management, coding management and review, laboratory orders and results, prescription writing and refill requests, conflict checking and transmission, patient encounter notes- generation, office messaging, document scanning and indexing, practice workflow online patient communications, medical information for physicians, eligibility verification, automated coding authorizations, referrals, patient-oriented medical information, financial reporting and other applications that relate to the administrative, financial, and clinical functions of a health care organization, and consultation services directly related thereto; development, customization, and consultation for others of computer software applications and computer hardware with a full suite of applications used to automate a medical practice namely, applications for registration, scheduling, office messaging, billing and electronic data interchange, collections management, coding management and review, laboratory orders and results, prescription writing and refill requests, conflict checking and transmission, patient encounter notes-generation, office messaging, document scanning and indexing, practice workflow online patient communications, medical information for physicians, eligibility verification, automated coding authorizations, referrals, patient-oriented medical information, financial reporting and other applications that relate to the administrative, financial, and clinical functions of a health care organization, and consultation services directly related thereto. The aforementioned specifically excludes consulting services directly related to computer software and hardware for medical image management and communication and display of such images and image-related information over local area networks, intranets, wide area networks, the Internet and other wired and wireless technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |