Drawing for PTI

USPTO serial 78117803

PTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacey R. Halpern

STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsACTIVE—
030LIQUID FABRICATED FOOD CONTAINING TITANIUM, NAMELY, TEA, COFFEE, COCOA, SEASONINGSACTIVE—
032Soft drinksACTIVE—
035MARKET RESEARCH, CONSUMER RESEARCHACTIVE—
042DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGN AND TESTING OF BEAUTY, HAIRDRESSING AND COSMETICS PRODUCTS TO CHECK AND TEST SKIN AND HAIR CONDITIONS, TO CHECK AND TEST THE HEALTHINESS OF HAIR AND SKIN, THE GLOSSINESS OF HAIR AND SKIN, AND THE NOURISHMENT OF HAIR AND SKIN AND TO CHECK AND TEST WHETHER HAIR, BEAUTY AND COSMETIC PRODUCTS ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY; INSPECTIONS OF BEAUTY, SALON, HAIRDRESSING, COSMETIC AND FOOD EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES, AND MACHINES, INSPECTIONS IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY, COSMETICS, HAIRDRESSING AND FOOD PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL; INSPECTION IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY, HAIRDRESSING, COSMETICS AND FOOD; LABORATORY RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY PRODUCTS, HAIRDRESSING PRODUCTS, COSMETICS AND FOOD PRODUCTS; PRODUCT RESEARCH; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; CHEMICAL RESEARCH; TECHNICAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELDS OF BEAUTY, HAIRDRESSING, COSMETICS AND FOODACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2005ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance