USPTO serial 78117903
ARCHERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARCHERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana M. Gilland
DANA M GILLAND DIAGEO N AMERICA INC801 MAIN AVENORWALK, CT 06851UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic beverages produced from brewed malt base and flavored malt beverages; alcoholic beverages, namely, schnapps, cordials, liqueurs, and premixed alcoholic cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Diageo Brands B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Guinness United Distillers & Vintners B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Guinness United Distillers & Vintners B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named ARCHERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |