USPTO serial 78118038
DLV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DLV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | DESIGNER LASER VAGINOPLASTY Laser Reduction Labioplasty of the labia minora Aesthetic Reconstruction and Enhancement of the Vulvar structures damaged by childbirth, trauma, aging, and certain deformities Laser Perineoplasty for the aesthetic rejuvenation of the aging (sagging) vulvar structures and introitus Laser Hymenoplasty for restoration of the hymen Aesthetic Augmentation Labioplasty of the (underdeveloped, or aging) labia majora via autologous fat transplantation Liposculpturing for the aesthetic reduction of the prominent or protruding mons pubis and labia majora COMBINATION OF LASER VAGINAL REJUVENATION AND DESIGNER LASER VAGINOPLASTY Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation can be performed in combination with any of the Designer Laser Vaginoplasty procedures Procedures in the Designer Laser Vaginoplasty category can be combines in various combinations COMBINATION OF LASER VAGINAL REJUVENATION AND/OR DESIGNER LASER VAGINOPLASTY WITH OTHER COSMETIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation and/or Designer Laser Vaginoplasty can be combined with most cosmetic surgical procedures | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |