USPTO serial 78118623
CXO MEDIA POLICY FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CXO MEDIA POLICY FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, SYMPOSIUMS, COLLOQUIUMS AND DISCUSSION GROUPS RELATING TO THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING A WEBSITE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |