USPTO serial 78118659
L.A. AGRESSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with L.A. AGRESSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
SAN JUAN, PR
Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luis J. Diaz
LUIS J DIAZ ESQ IDT CORPORATION520 BROAD STNEWARK, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Prepaid calling card and debit card services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
- Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
- Other trademarks owned by IDT NETHERLANDS, B.V. (PUERTO RICO BRANCH)
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named L.A. AGRESSIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |