Drawing for MOM FRIENDLY

USPTO serial 78118697

MOM FRIENDLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOM FRIENDLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur J. DeBaugh, Esq.

ARTHUR J DEBAUGH ESQ C/O CHRYSTAL M PETTITTSARA LEE CORPORATION1000 E HANES MILL RDWINSTON SALEM, NC 27105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes, namely canvas and leather dress shoes, casual shoes, boots, sandals, slippers, beach shoes and sneakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 16, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 16, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 31, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance