USPTO serial 78121067
GELPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2819565Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GELPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline G. Chicoine
Gregory E Upchurch Husch & Eppenberger190 Carondelet PlzSte 600St Louis, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SHOCK/IMPACT ABSORBING INSERTS AND PADS SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF SAFETY GLOVES AND SHOES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
| 025 | SHOCK/IMPACT ABSORBING INSERTS AND PADS SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF GLOVES AND SHOES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
| 028 | SHOCK/IMPACT ABSORBING INSERTS, PADS AND WRAPS SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF SPORTS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, SHOULDER PADS, KNEE PADS, SHIN PADS, BATS, TENNIS RACKETS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chase Ergonomics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chase Ergonomics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chase Ergonomics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GELPACT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |