USPTO serial 78121193
CRANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wachsmuth & Krogmann Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wachsmuth & Krogmann Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CRANE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |