USPTO serial 78121365
DEFROST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEFROST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Murtaugh
JOHN P MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather sold in bulk; imitations of leather sold in bulk; all purpose athletic bags, beach bags, bookbags, carry-on bags, overnight bags, shoulder bags, travel bags, handbags, tote bags, school bags, and rucksacks; suitcases, trunks and traveling bags; executive attaché cases; traveling manicure cases sold empty; purses, wallets, key cases, belt bags, and hip bags; umbrellas; parasols | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, long trousers, jeans, slacks, short trousers, shorts, boxer shorts, 3/4 length trousers, slacks with strap under foot, culottes, blouses, dresses, sweaters, shirts, short-sleeved shirts, T-shirts, long-sleeved shirts, socks; outerwear for gentlemen, ladies and children, namely, waistcoats, jackets, denim jackets, coats, tunics, blazers, lounging jackets, bomber jackets, overalls, dungarees; babies clothing, namely, shirts, pants, under shirts, under pants, one-piece sleepers, dresses; underwear, long underpants, short underpants, long-sleeved undershirts, short-sleeved undershirts; undergarments; corsets, bustiers; dressing gowns; hosiery; belts, suspenders, scarves, shawls, gloves, ties, headbands, baseball caps; bathing fashion for gentlemen and ladies, namely, bathing suits, swimsuits and bathing trunks; clothing for hiking, trekking, outdoor sports and climbing, namely, coats, jackets, vests, pullovers, shirts, pants, shorts, socks; clothing for soccer, basketball, handball and volleyball, namely, shirts, shorts, warm-up jackets, warm-up pants; clothing for jogging, fitness training and gymnastics, namely, jogging suits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweatshorts, gym shorts, sweat bands, head bands, body suits, leotards, leggings, leg warmers; clothing and headwear for tennis, squash and badminton, namely, shirts, shorts, skirts, dresses, hats, visors; clothing for inline-skating, skateboarding, roller skating, hockey, football, baseball and boxing, namely, jerseys, shirts, pants, shorts; clothing, footwear and headwear for cycling, horseback riding, and golfing, namely, pants, shirts, jackets, hats, boots; clothing for water sports including surfing, sailing, rowing, canoeing and diving, namely, bathing suits, bathing trunks, wet suits, shirts, shorts; clothing, footwear and headwear for skiing, cross country skiing, snowboarding, ice-skating and ice hockey, namely, jackets, pants, boots, snow boots, snowboard boots, after ski boots, ski boots, ski gloves, ski pants, ski bibs, hats, woolen hats, caps, sweat bands, head bands; footwear; headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |