USPTO serial 78121611
PEAK HABITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEAK HABITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging and conducting business conferences; business consultation; Business management and consultation; Business organizational consultation; Concession stands featuring books, audio tapes, video tapes, compact discs, DVDs; Conducting business surveys; Direct response retail services by means of infomercials in the field of books, audio tapes, video tapes, compact discs, DVDs; Management assistance; Personnel management consultation | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2002 |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Career counseling; Conducting workshops and seminars in personal awareness; Conducting workshops and seminars in professional awareness; Counseling in the field of human behavior; Education services namely, one-on-one mentoring in the field of human behavior; Education services, namely, providing tutorial sessions in the field of human behavior; Educational services namely conducting programs in the field of human behavior; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a professional coach, business executive and human behavior expert; Personal coaching services in the field of human behavior; Publication of books; Training services in the field of human behavior | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |