USPTO serial 78122151
WE FOCUS ON PERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3090863Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE FOCUS ON PERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
HEIDELBERG, DE
20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
HEIDELBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
MUENCHEN, DE
20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
HEIDELBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil K. Nydegger
NEIL K NYDEGGER NYDEGGER & ASSOCIATES348 OLIVE STSAN DIEGO, CA 92103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | OPHTHALMIC AND OPTOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, REFRACTOMETERS, KERATOMETERS, OPHTHALMOMETERS, TOPOMETERS, ABERROMETERS, AND REFRACTIVE SURGICAL LASERS; INTRAOCULAR APPARATUS FOR VISION CORRECTION/ENHANCEMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION AG
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLAS PERFECT VISION GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named WE FOCUS ON PERFECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |