USPTO serial 78122228
MACA BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACA BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY340 E PALM LN STE 282PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PROTEIN BASED NUTRIENT-DENSE SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | May 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |