Drawing for MEDIATECHNIUM

USPTO serial 78122576

MEDIATECHNIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIATECHNIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn M. Sandberg

CAROLYN M SANDBERG LINDQUIST & VENNUM PLLP4200 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Accounting services; Business management services, Business management consultation; Business research and consultation; Commercial and industrial management assistance; Conducting marketing studies; Market research and market research consultation; Public relations services; Rental of office machinery and equipmentACTIVE—
036Financial analysis; Financial consultation; Financial valuation of real estate and personal property; Providing financial information; Financing services; Real estate management; rental of office space and industrial building spaceACTIVE—
041Providing training services, namely, conducting seminars in the fields of management and business management spaceACTIVE—
042Technical research and consultation services in the field of multimedia productions; Technical reporting services for others, namely the preparation of technological reports in the field of multimedia; Legal services; Intellectual property consultation services; intellectual property licensing services spaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 11, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance