USPTO serial 78122792
STRONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. Michael Sajovec
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVECP O BOX 37428RALEIGH, NC 27627UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Brass padlocks; solid hardened steel padlocks; stainless steel padlocks; laminated steel padlocks; zinc aluminum die-cast padlocks; aluminum padlocks; plastic covered brass or steel padlocks; bike locks; combination motor vehicle steering wheel locks; metal security lock cylinders; rim cylinders; door hardware, namely keys and key cylinders; metal key blanks; metal door bolts; metal drawer locks; metal cupboard locks; metal rolling gate locks; steel in the form of blanks and stampings; zinc aluminum die-cast bars; door lock sets comprising of deadbolt locks and entry door locks. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |