USPTO serial 78122910
MASTERCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic encoded cards and cards containing and integrated circuit chip, namely, encoded electronic chip cards containing software and other programs used for the purpose of conducting financial transactions; magnetic coded charge cards, magnetic coded bank cards, magnetic coded credit cards, magnetic coded debit cards and payment cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |