Drawing for RE-VIGOR

USPTO serial 78122950

RE-VIGOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RE-VIGOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emily E. Harris

Emily E. Harris Davis Brown Law Firm666 Walnut Street, Suite 2500Davis Brown Law FirmDes Moines, IA 50309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Composition for preventing muscle mass loss in ederly humans comprised essentially of beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutric acid (HMB) and amino acidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance