USPTO serial 78123092
ANEW.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANEW.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, namely, distributed computer hardware systems and applications that share and integrate data from heterogeneous and autonomous sources over the Internet or local area network utilizing the XML standard and other computer platform standards; Computer software and utility software for use in the development of other software for use in the distributed computer systems and interoperating applications over the Internet or local area network; Computer software, namely, database management tools for use in problem-oriented distributed data queries and distributed data transactions; Computer hardware and software, namely, a data-consolidation server for database synchronization over the Internet or local area network; Computer software, namely, GUI-based tool kits that supports installation, customization, and administration of the Web-based data-sharing application systems including configuration of distributed data queries and distributed data transactions over the Internet or local area network | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |