USPTO serial 78123335
CRUSH GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRUSH GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia A. Nishimoto
CYNTHIA NISHIMOTO BANDAI AMERICA INCORPORATED5551 KATELLA AVECYPRESS, CA 90630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Accessories for dolls clothes, Action figures, Bubble making wand and solution sets, Doll accessories, Doll cases, Doll clothing, Doll furniture, Doll house furnishings, Dolls; Kites, Musical toys, Paper dolls, Play sets for dolls Talking toys, Toy bake ware and cookware, Toy banks, Toy tops, Toy vehicles, Toy watches, Video games, namely, coin operated and automatic video games in the nature of amusement machines and coin-operated toy vehicles for use in amusement parks; electronic games machines, namely, video and stand along video output game machines, LCD game machines, ball pitching machines, and coin and non-coin operated pinball machines; arcade games; card games; balls for games, namely baseballs, paddle balls, pinballs, tennis balls, billiard balls, and sport balls; checker sets; chess sets; magic tricks; darts; dice; dominoes; gloves for sports and games, namely pinball gloves, baseball gloves, and golf gloves; marbles for games; stuffed toys; toy figures; toy robots; toy vehicles; toys for intellectual training, namely, baby multiple activity toys and board games; toy tops; plastic model kits, namely, toy model train and airplane sets, scale model airplanes, and toy model vehicles and related accessories sold together as units, yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |