Drawing for GROW POD

USPTO serial 78123566

GROW POD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROW POD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019pre-fabricated geodesic plastic greenhousesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 13, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Nov 11, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 4, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance