Drawing for MS WEALTH MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 78124188

MS WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MS WEALTH MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial analysis, banking, home banking, brokerage services in the field of stocks and bonds, capital investment consultation, charitable fund raising, collection agency services, financial consultation, insurance consultation, credit bureaus, credit card services, issuance of credit cards, debit card services, financial valuation of real estate, insurance holdings and bank holdings, exchanging money, fiduciary representatives, financial information, financial management, financing services, fiscal assessment, mutual fund investment services, electronic funds transfer, financial guarantee, hire-purchase financing, insurance information, installment loans, money lending against security, financial loans, mortgage banking, mutual fund brokerage services, safe deposit services, savings banks, securities brokerage, stock exchange quotations, stocks and bonds brokerage, surety services, trusteeship representative servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 200344DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance