USPTO serial 78126211
CWEBB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CWEBB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Simmons-Gill
CATHERINE SIMMONS-GILL OFFICES OF CATHERINE SIMMONS-GILL LLC221 N LASALLE ST STE 2036CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweat shirts, warm up suits, jackets, head wear, jerseys, tank tops, shorts, pants, socks and shoes | ACTIVE | May 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |