Drawing for NEXTGEN FIBER OPTICS LLC

USPTO serial 78126416

NEXTGEN FIBER OPTICS LLC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXTGEN FIBER OPTICS LLC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Turk

MEGAN E SPITZ BLANK ROME LLP9TH FLONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FIBER OPTIC CABLE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FIBER OPTIC CABLES, CABLE SPLITTERS, BREAKOUT KITS COMPRISING TUBING AND SLEEVES TO HOLD CABLES TOGETHER, PULLING EYE ASSEMBLIES COMPRISING A TUBE AND A HOOK, AND CABLE TERMINATIONS AND CONNECTORSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 2, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jun 9, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance