USPTO serial 78127732
CAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN STRATEGIC CORPORATE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR CLIENTS, NAMELY, ASSISTING SUCH CLIENTS IN INCREASING MARKET PENETRATION AND PRESENCE AS WELL AS PROMOTING AND DEVELOPING THEIR CORPORATE OR PUBLIC IMAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |