USPTO serial 78129281
DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Villingen-Schwenningen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene E. Renz, Jr.
EUGENE E RENZ JR ESQ EUGENE E RENZ, JR PC205 N MONROE STPOST OFFICE BOX 2056MEDIA, PA 19063-9056Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing and measuring devices; electrical installation devices; electrical installation materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting fittings, illumination devices, radiation devices for medical and cosmetic purposes; accessories for illumination and radiation devices; namely, light fittings and lamps, reflectors, diaphragms, antidazzling devices, stands, ventilators, magnifying lenses | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation of electrical systems and appliances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |