USPTO serial 78130284
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Bromley
GEORGE BROMLEY LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE ROCKY BROMLEY2122 N MAIN AVESAN ANTONIO, TX 78212-5851UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies, and food package combinations consisting primarily of cookies | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |