USPTO serial 78131019
Serial No. 78131019
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78131019?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Konizeski
GRACE W LAWSON CROWELL & MORING, LLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Collection of pre-recorded video tapes, and downloadable video recordings on health and alternative medicine and herbal remedies. | ACTIVE | May 14, 2002 |
| 016 | printed materials, namely books, manuals, workbooks, brochures and newsletters on health, alternative medicine and herbal remedies. | ACTIVE | May 14, 2002 |
| 044 | providing information in the field of health, alternative medicine and herbal remedies. | ACTIVE | May 14, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |