USPTO serial 78131615
WATCHMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATCHMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer code conversion for others; computer consultation; computer diagnostic services; computer graphics services; computer network design for others; computer programming for others; computer project management services; computer software consultation; computer software and hardware design for others; computer software development; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; cross-platform conversion of digital content into other forms of digital content; data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; data conversion of computer program data and information; data mining; data warehousing; database development services; design and testing for new product development; computer design for others; design and development of new technology for others; installation of computer software; integration of computer systems and networks; maintenance of computer software; product development consultation; product research, development and design for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical writing for others; up-dating computer software; computer services, namely, providing non-downloadable software via the Internet for creating, installing, executing, managing and integrating with broadband and wireless applications for network management; providing non-downloadable software via the Internet for the management, maintenance and monitoring of telecommunications, wireless and Internet networks; providing non-downloadable software via the Internet to monitor network service quality, performance and capacity and optimize network performance; providing non-downloadable software via the Internet for network analysis and management, namely, tracking, aggregating, reporting and displaying of network performance, utilization, capacity, configuration, expansion, fraud, and other problems; providing non-downloadable software via the Internet for database management; providing non-downloadable software via the Internet for telecommunications, wireless and Internet network management, namely for real-time visualization of physical network topology and transmission links and performance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |