USPTO serial 78132798
OREGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OREGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Central Point, OR
CENTRAL POINT, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Bridges
JENNIFER BRIDGES DAVIS HEARN SALADOFF & SMITH PC515 E MAIN STASHLAND, OR 97520-2113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Different types of Blue Cheese | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1957 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |