Drawing for NTUITIVE

USPTO serial 78133082

NTUITIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NTUITIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L Crockett

SUSAN L CROCKETT CROCKETT & CROCKETT24012 CALLE DE LA PLATASTE 400LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007semiconductor wafer processing machines, namely, chemical mechanical planarizers, silicon wafer carriers, silicon wafer loaders, silicon wafer endpoint detectors, silicon wafer grinders, silicon wafer polishers and replacement parts therefor; photonics, optical and telecommunication component processing machines, namely chemical mechanical planarizers, silicon wafer carriers, silicon wafer loaders, silicon wafer endpoint detectors, silicon wafer grinders, silicon wafer polishers and replacement parts therefor; all for the research, failure analysis, processing and production of semiconductor substrates, thin films, silicon discs, silicon wafers, optical components, photonics components and telecommunication componentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance