USPTO serial 78133137
AIRDEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRDEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alpharettta, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Use in Commerce) COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ASSESSING AND PROTECTING WIRELESS AND WIRED COMPUTER NETWORKS, SERVERS, APPLICATIONS AND DESKTOPS AGAINST ATTACK,INTRUSION AND MISUSE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROTECTING DATA/INFORMATION STORED ON AND/OR TRANSMITTED ACROSS WIRELESS and WIRED NETWORKS, SERVERS, APPLICATIONS AND DESKTOPS AGAINST ATTACK, INTRUSION AND MISUSE | ACTIVE | May 24, 2002 |
| 041 | (Based on Intent to Use) TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF ASSESSMENT AND PROTECTION OF COMPUTER DATA/INFORMATION, NETWORKS, SERVERS, APPLICATIONS AND DESKTOPS AGAINST ATTACH,INTRUSION AND MISUSE; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING COURSES IN THE FIELD OF ASSESSMENT AND PROTECTION OF COMPUTER DATA/INFORMATION, NETWORKS, SERVERS, APPLICATIONS AND DESKTOPS AGAINST ATTACK, INTRUSION AND MISUSE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |