USPTO serial 78134570
WEBSITE YELLOWPAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEBSITE YELLOWPAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Connelly
Thomas J. Connelly Wilhelm Law, S.C.100 West Lawrence Street, 3rd FloorAPPLETON, WI 54911UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed directories of website addresses, email addresses, physical addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers, and toll free numbers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLATINUM ADVERTISING LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RECLICKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Local Area Business Internet Listings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Local Area Business Internet Listings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEBSITE YELLOWPAGES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |