Drawing for FISHMATE

USPTO serial 78135848

FISHMATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEJESUS, YSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FISHMATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. Beard

JOHN L BEARD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing online business listings featuring local fishing guide services and local professional tournament participantsACTIVE—
039providing online navigational information services; online tourist information featuring local information of fishing locationsACTIVE—
041providing information relating to boating and fishing via a global computer network featuring information on fishing tournamentsACTIVE—
042providing online governmental information featuring local rules relating to obtaining fishing licenses and fishing regulations in the nature of limits and seasonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 29, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance