USPTO serial 78136199
NIRVANA LOUNGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIRVANA LOUNGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Schneck
THOMAS SCHNECK LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS SCHNECK80 S MARKET ST THIRD FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PHONOGRAPH RECORDS FEATURING MUSIC AND MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS, NAMELY, AUDIO, VIDEO AND OPTICAL COMPACT DISCS AND TAPES FEATURING MUSIC AND MUSICAL VIDEO CLIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED TICKETS; PRINTED PAPER AND CARDBOARD SIGNS; PAPER AND CARDBOARD COVERS AND SLEEVES FOR PHONOGRAPH RECORDS; BLANK AND PARTIALLY PRINTED LABELS NOT OF TEXTILE; PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS FEATURING MUSIC, NATURE, ENTERTAINMENT, FOOD WAY OF LIFE AND DESIGN; POSTERS; POST CARDS; ARTIST MATERIALS, NAMELY INFORMATIONAL FLYERS ON ENTERTAINMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF PARTIES; PRINTED CLICHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Bar services; restaurant services; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |