Drawing for ACAI POWER FRUIT OF THE AMAZON

USPTO serial 78136409

ACAI POWER FRUIT OF THE AMAZON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACAI POWER FRUIT OF THE AMAZON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hillary S. Meisels

HILLARY S MEISELS HILLARY A MEISELS ATTORNEY AT LAW314A S BROADWAYREDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-3709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit drinks, fruit juice, sports drinks, fruit juice beverage enhanced with vitamins, minerals and herbs.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance