USPTO serial 78136692
SIMTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio, video and security consumer electronic products and parts and accessories therefor, namely, video cameras, audio and video tape recorders, home alarm systems, namely burglar alarms and fire alarms, television sets, radios and DVD players | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |