USPTO serial 78137380
PATIENTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PATIENTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Willsey
PETER J WILLSEY COOLEY GODWARD LLP875 15TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2221UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | television sets; telephones; electronic consoles; video game consoles; computers; radios; instruments for recording, reproducing, carrying, storing, processing, manipulating, transmitting, broadcasting, retrieving and reproducing music, sounds, images, text, signals, software, information, data and code in the nature of televisions, telephones, radios, computers, electronic messaging or mailing apparatus namely, computers and personal wireless handheld communications devices, electronic consoles, video game consoles, computer servers, and networks of one or more of such instruments; media for recording, reproducing, carrying, storing, music, sounds, images, text, signals, software, information, data and code in the nature of discs or cassettes; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, and/or cable transmissions; telecommunications services, namely the provision of digital networks for recording, reproducing, carrying, storing, processing, manipulating, transmitting, broadcasting, retrieving and reproducing music, sounds, images, text, signals, software, information, data and code in the nature of televisions, telephones, radios, computers, electronic messaging or mailing apparatus, electronic or video game consoles; electronic communication services in the nature of delivery and sending of messages and information by electronic transmission; electronic mail services; provision of telecommunications access to the Internet; video on demand transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | distribution of video and sound recordings for others; leasing and rental of televisions, radios, video games, films, and sound and video recordings; advisory, consultancy or information services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |