Drawing for PREDICTION DYNAMICS

USPTO serial 78137611

PREDICTION DYNAMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PREDICTION DYNAMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria Eliseeva

BRIAN L MICHAELIS BROWN RUDNICK BERLACK ISRAELS LLPBOX IP ONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software in the field of financial market analysis, trading, investment risk management and financial modeling for hedge funds and financial institutionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2003OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance