USPTO serial 78137771
MENZIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENZIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edinburgh Scotland, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Anthony, Jr.
WILLIAM D ANTHONY JR MCBREEN & KOPKO111 S ADAMS STHINSDALE, IL 60521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE CHECK-IN SERVICES; AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE CUSTOMS CLEARANCE SERVICES; AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE CHECK-IN SERVICES; WHOLESALE SERVICES FOR ENABLING CUSTOMERS TO SELECT AND PURCHASE AIR FREIGHT SERVICES; CONTRACT LABOR, PERSONNEL AND MANPOWER SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | AIRPORT GROUND HANDLING SERVICES, NAMELY, CLEANING AND FUELING AIRCRAFT; MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF AIRCRAFT, CARGO, PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE HANDLING EQUIPMENT; AIRCRAFT CLEANING SERVICES; AND AIRCRAFT DEICING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | AIRPORT GROUND SERVICES, NAMELY CARGO, BAGGAGE, MAIL AND FREIGHT TRANSPORT SERVICES; CARGO, BAGGAGE, MAIL AND FREIGHT HANDLING SERVICES; CARGO, BAGGAGE, MAIL AND FREIGHT FORWARDING SERVICES; CARGO, BAGGAGE, MAIL AND FREIGHT DISTRIBUTION SERVICES; DISTRIBUTION IN THE NATURE OF PRINTED MATTER; AIR PASSENGER HANDLING SERVICES; AIR COURIER SERVICES; AIRCRAFT GROUND HANDLING SERVICES; AIRFREIGHT CONSOLIDATION SERVICES; AIR FREIGHT WHOLESALING SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING CUSTOMERS TO SELECT TO SELECT AND PURCHASE AIR FREIGHT CAPACITY BY MEANS OF TELECOMMUNICATION; AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE TRANSFER SERVICES; GROUND TRANSFER OF AIR PASSENGERS; AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE CHECK-IN SERVICES; AIR PASSENGER BAGGAGE HANDLING SERVICES; AIR PASSENGER AND BAGGAGE COMPLAINTS HANDLING SERVICES; AIRCRAFT LOADING AND UNLOADING SERVICES; AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |