Drawing for TSAS

USPTO serial 78137820

TSAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TSAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip E. Ketner

PHILIP E KETNER NAVY OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSELNAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CTR (CODE 00L)503 ROBERT GRANT AVESILVER SPRING, MD 20910-7500

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed instructional, educational materials and informational flyers concerning a government defense programs; Journals for medical and scientific researchACTIVE—
021Household containers, namely drinking glasses and earthenware mugsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
026Embroidered emblems and cloth patches for clothingACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of technical data and information to a person via computer from personal and on-board detection equipment, namely, transmission of tactile sensory input to a garment worn by pilots, operators of spacecraft, operators of heavy equipment and sea-going vessels and visually impaired persons to determine their spatial orientation and for them to determine an approaching foreign object's distance and bearingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 26, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 25, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance