Drawing for VIDA NATURAL

USPTO serial 78137843

VIDA NATURAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, KARLA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIDA NATURAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005vitamins, minerals and dietary supplementsABANDONEDJun 20, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 19, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 19, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 17, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2004CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Jun 23, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 15, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Aug 19, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2003GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance