USPTO serial 78138070
EDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen M. Walsh
KRISTEN M WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLPCLINTON SQ P O BOX 31051ROCHESTER, NY 14603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | online selection, sourcing, pricing, and ordering of process control and related equipment and parts to instrument and electrical contractors and oil patch supply stores; online selection, sourcing, pricing, and ordering of process control and related equipment and parts to instrument and electrical contractors and oil patch supply stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |