USPTO serial 78138371
AGREE TO DISAGREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGREE TO DISAGREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein, Esq.
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN ESQ TECHMARK55 SO MARKET ST SIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, namely, compilers, assemblers, emulator software for allowing one type of computer run programs designed for another, conversion programs for use in transferring and converting data, text and binary files and application software programs between computers having different operating systems and data layouts; visual development software, application development environments, tools and utilities for use in creating applications, e-commerce programs, Internet and web-based applications and other programs, and for developing software to allow interoperability between compatible and non-compatible computer and database systems; computer software development tools, namely, program and application development software, tools and utilities, all for use in designing, developing, writing and implementing user-specific applications and general purpose applications programs; object-oriented and client/server programming development software, tools and utilities; database, server database and database management software; development software, tools and utilities for use in designing and implementing programs for providing logical interoperability among and/or between compatible and/or non-compatible systems, formats, standards, applications and databases; software programs for enabling connections to local area networks, enterprise networks, intranets, extranets, corporate information networks, wide area networks and globally interconnected computer networks linked by common or diverse protocols; computer ecommerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; software used to provide interoperability between and integration of legacy systems with e-application packages, enterprise-wide interoperability of all applications and of all data sources and databases; programming tools and utility programs for use in developing, maintaining, enhancing and operating computer programs and computer systems, and user manuals sold therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |